Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/hasCommentText> ?o ?g. }
- comment hasCommentText "The modelling of the formalization is good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Maybe the scientific claim should be rephrased a bit to reflect the growth effect more, instead of just using "mechanically drives"." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance of the formalization needs to be a "FormalizationActivity", but at the moment the "sub:quote" field is missing. There a link to the article from which the scientific claim was taken needs to be specified ("sub:quote prov:wasQuotedFrom <https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0158>"), together with the quote from the article from which the scientific claim was derived ("sub:quote prov:value "add phrase from original article from which the scientific claim was extracted or rephrased" ")." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The modelling of the formalization seems to reflect well the content of the scientific claim." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance of the formalization should be a "FormalizationActivity". As such, more details can be given about the original article from which the scientific claim was derived, the original content from the article (the quote) of the phrase from which the scientific claim was derived (can be the same as the scientific claim itself if it was not rephrased) and the author of the formalization." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The modelling of the formalization reflects very well the scientific claim." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance of the formalization is the result of a "FormalizationAcitvity", which is correctly chosen and filled in." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance of the formalization is a "FormalizationActivity" as was correctly chosen and filled in." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance indicates that this is a joint-authored formalization." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The rephrasing of the scientific claim is clear and in an AIDA-form." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This is not a subclassof obesity (http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q12174), but a skos:relatedTo class. This should be corrected." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The label of the superpattern instance should be a short human-readable sentence, not the DOI of the original paper." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "It seems to me that the object class should be something like 'excess or deficiency of vitamin A' and not just 'vitamin A'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Referring to another reviewer's comments, I think having underscores '_' instead of hythens '-' for class URIs is perfectly fine. So, I think no action is required on this." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This looks like a good formalization to me." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The quote provided in the provenance seems to be a general quote from the source rather than the specific passage on which this formalization is based." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provided label for the superpattern instance refers to 'licenses with a non-commertial clause' in general, whereas the actual formalization has the specific kind of license 'Creative Commons NonCommercial' in subject position. This should be make consistent in one way or the other." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "With a protein class in the object position and a gene in the context, this raises for me the question what it means for a protein to be in the context of a gene. Maybe a class like 'presence of TAR DNA binding protein' in object position might make it clearer? But I am not sure..." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "With a protein class in the object position and a gene in the context, this raises for me the question what it means for a protein to be in the context of a gene. Maybe a class like 'presence of TAR DNA binding protein' in object position might make it clearer? But I am not sure..." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This looks like a very good formalization to me." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "As humans typically belong to many different groups of different kinds, I am inclined to think that the context class should more specifically be 'social group of humans' (possibly with a quite technical and precise definition) and not just 'group of humans'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I am wondering whether the "never causes" is a bit too strong a relation, also given the natural language sentence. "Never affects" might be more precise than "never causes". (This is also a stronger statement, more likely to be wrong, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.)" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I find the context class 'Digital Humanities' a bit confusing, as it is unclear to me what the instances of this class are. WikiData is not always very precise about this, but the superpattern is. I believe that a context class like 'Digital Humanities research' (as mentioned in the label) would make more sense." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance of this formalization is a "FormalizationActivity" where the link to the article and the actual quote from the same article from which the scientific claim was derived need to be specified together with the orcid of the formalization author. This should be changed accordingly." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The modeling of the formalization for the specific scientific claim looks good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Reference to the original article is missing" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance section does not contain a reference to the original article" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The relation subClassOf was replaced with skos:related as it matches better the intended meaning. The new class is now related to both - the neocortex and size - classes." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for the review" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance is correct, the formalization is the result of a "FormalizationActivity" and the article and exact quote from the article of the scientific claim are present." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your comment." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree with this formalization." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree with the style adopted for this representation." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The content of this formalization looks good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Good claim representation" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The object class should point to the link of the class: http://purl.org/np/RAiUYY1dbEDbcsscapEmbMMHsgJmjEJ1yUoNsxZIH1r90#transcription-of-stmn2, instead of the link to the nanopublication in which this class is published." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks for the feedback" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks for the feedback" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks for the feedback" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Right - i see that adherence to the FAIR principles is a more specific form of adherence. the ontologist in me wants to make this a subclass :)" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I updated the quote, that now comes from the (abstract of the) original article." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree that this can be confusing. In response to a formalization review comment (3), I added a new class "Digital humanities research"which is a subclass of the resource "research" in wikidata and related to the resource "digital humanities" in wikidata." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree that this can be confusing. In response to a formalization review comment (3), I added a new class "Digital humanities research"which is a subclass of the resource "research" in wikidata and related to the resource "digital humanities" in wikidata." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Changed to the suggested doi. Thank you" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Provenance was changed to show that it was generated by a formalization activity, and the necessary attributes of that template were added." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Suggestion adopted." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Whether we consider a protein in the context of a gene or the PRESENCE of the protein in that context is a subtle distinction whose need here eludes me. This requires further discussion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Added IRX3 and IRX5 as related classes" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "AND was changed to and" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "no action needed" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "no action needed" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Couldnt find the appropriate subclass for "regulatory element"" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "related classes added" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "An exact quote from the article was added" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "the article link was updated as suggested" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "no action needed" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "changed to the updated format where AND was replaced with and" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "no action needed" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks for the positive review on the class definition." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree that it was not clear that this is an instance. To address this review comment, I have created a new class (latest-release-of-openbiodiv), which is a subclass of software release (Q20631656) and related to openbiodiv-knowledge-graph, and I have updated the formalisation nanopub to say that 'The latest release of the OpenBiodiv knowledge graph contains semantic triples extracted from biodiversity literature'. Thank you for your review!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "nothing to change" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "no modification requested" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I have updated the class to refer to more appropriate wikidata class" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "addressed in previous comment" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Addressed in previous correction" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your valuable suggestion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This has been corrected." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion which has been implemented." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for the suggestion which was implemented." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for the suggestion which was implemented." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "We discussed that and agree to change the context (and the classes) so that "universal context" fits best." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The publication is about overlapping genes in the disease networks of CAKUT and in the vitamin A targets. There is no causality involved." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Changed according to suggestion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Changed according to suggestion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "No excess or deficiency involved here, that is just a statement that Vitamin A targets and CAKUT related proteins overlap (are sometimes the same)." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Changed according to suggestion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "We discussed that and agreed to "universal context" together with a change of subject and object classes." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "agreed. nothing to change" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "updated to reflect ecm binding as a property of the cancer cell" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Publication link included" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Ignored according to Cristina's recommendation" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "There is now!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes! I am quite clever." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Class updated" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Provenance updated" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Here a 'cancer cell engaged in extracellular matrix' is defined as the intersection between the classes 'cancer cell' and 'extracellular matrix', but as the latter is defined as 'structure external to cells' this intersection is empty. I think this should rather be defined as a subclass of 'cancer cell' with some (possibly informal) link to the concept of 'extracellular matrix'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Maybe using the "mostly" qualifier would have been better" assertion.