Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/hasCommentText> ?o ?g. }
- comment hasCommentText "An exact quote from the paper was added" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The paper refers to both genes and both genes are regulated. Not sure if it should be split into two claims or remain as one" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "We agree with this review comment and have addressed it by defining a new class license-with-non-commercial-clause which is a subclass of software license (Q79719) and is related to Q65071627 and have used this new class as the subject of our updated formalisation." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you! In response to your other review comment we made small changes to the formalisation." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your review! While we agree that when it comes to legal issues a more concrete language should be used, our formalisation is of a statement which expresses an opinion rather than a legal fact. Licenses with a non-commercial clause do not inhibit reuse of biodiversity data because of legal reasons but as a consequence of the difficulty to reuse data." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your review!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance of this nanopublication should be a FormalizationActivity and all the fields should be filled in in an appropriate manner: the link to the article, formalization author orcid, the exact quote from the article that contains the scientific claim." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The general structure of the formalization is good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The general class definition is good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I would add a skos:related class with "metabolic abnormality" if such class exists." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Changed according to suggestion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Chris Evelo added as author as agreed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Replaced by new class." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "added publication" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "no change required" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "made changes" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "my pleasure!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Looking at this again, I think this formalization can be made more precise (and in a way simpler) by not using the universal context, but instead biodiversity data (Q28946370) as context and data reuse (Q58023280) as object." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I adressed the good point made by the reviewer following his suggestion: mint a new class 'dysfunction of ERAD pathway' and then use this class in object position." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree and I changed the provenance using the 'Generated by a formalization activity' template following reviewer's suggestion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree and I changed the provenance using the 'Generated by a formalization activity' template accordingly." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This is just a test with a long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long comment." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, and maybe we should clarify the procedure for doing this systematically." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, and we have also added the full stop at the end." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, and as expressed in http://purl.org/np/RAANP7AWgyZRaS2WgNcGDfp8-4bXv0blhKapMcUrrWvos , it would be nice to have a way to quantify the solidity." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, and it would be nice to have a way to assess how well the formalization corresponds to the original claim." assertion.